As the erroneously blacklisted Joe McCarthy once said, “I realize full well how unpopular it is to lay hands on the laurels of a man who has been built into a great hero. I very much dislike it, but I feel that it must be done if we are to intelligently make the proper decisions in the issues of life and death before us.” Although, the gallant McCarthy was referring to the failed policies of Truman-appointee George C. Marshall, his relevant and courageous example should be followed when examining Barack Obama today.
Now given that I am an unabashed member of the Republican Party, I am expected by certain members of my party to throw my support towards John ’straight talk express’ McCain. Unarguably, I would have agreed to this same notion months ago: Always support your party no matter what the circumstances because while there are a lot of rotten republicans, there are no good democrats. Sadly in my first presidential election as a 17 year old voter, I am convinced that this rule fails under the weight of John McCain’s liberalism.
Regrettably, three democrats are running for president. I could spend all year discussing why John McCain isn’t a ‘true’ republican, but that’s not my case in point. I am not only bewildered by the fact that Barack Obama is even considered a viable candidate for president, but astounded by the American people’s blatant disregard for his inexperience, inconsistency, and manifestly obvious subversive tendencies (e.g. not saluting the American flag).
Contrary to the glamorized demigod the mainstream media has tried to turn Barack Obama into, it should be known that the authentic Barack Obama is incognito. The coy media would never reveal or place heavy emphasis on the faults of their darling Barack Obama. Here are a few examples: He has quite the truancy record for both his tenures in the Illinois State Senate and U.S. Senate due to ‘family’ vacations to various exotic locations. He is an ardent anti-gay marriage legislation activist (another reason why the GOP is the party for gays—the Republicans just don’t want gays getting married; Democrats actually deceive them by pretending to be pro-gay!). He can’t finish a sentence without uttering the words ‘change’, ‘hope’, or ‘inspiration’. Apparently, if you don’t vote for Barack Obama, you are against hope in America and all of his other hackneyed verbiage because he clearly has sole dominion over these trite phrases and no other candidate is pro-hope.
The most concealed detail about Barack Obama is where he congregates every Sabbath day for church. The “Unashamedly black and unapologetically Christian,” Trinity United Church of Christ located in Chicago, Illinois pastured by Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr. (Obama’s esteemed mentor), is where Obama finds his spiritual fruit for the soul. The controversial church preaches Afrocentrism, racism and Bush-bashing to its adoring congregation. Now the latter may not appear to be as abominable as the former, but if that doesn’t spark the fire in your igniter the racist part should. Recently, Wright’s most notorious statements have been headliners for various news outlets. I would encourage you to read them. Additionally, black Muslim Louis Farrakhan a.k.a. ‘the black Hitler’ has appeared on the cover of the Trumpet News magazine, the church’s publication, on numerous occasions. One of his most famous racist retorts on the subject of ‘White America’ is “White people are potential humans – they haven’t evolved yet.”
Perhaps, it’s also unknown that Islamic mosques are being used to electioneer for Obama. And no, for all of you optimists, these aren’t the self-proclaimed ‘Muslims for Bush’ quasi-groups that are adjuring for Obama’s election. Arabs and Muslims in various Islamic countries have endorsed Obama as their pick for the leader of the free-world. This is not implying that all Muslims are terrorists, but as a statement of fact: All terrorists have been Muslims. Hamas sympathizer, CAIR, has also decided to endorse Barack Obama for President. It’s safe to claim Barack Obama has won the Muslim vote!
To make my argument more feasible to the conservative movement, Barack Obama will impose a monumental detriment to everything we’ve achieved since the Reagan Revolution. Instead of viewing Obama as some omnipotent, why not point out his most glaring problem: his air-headed liberalism and naiveté. He assumes that because his campaign has phenomenal organization (to his credit), he is invincible and therefore impervious to political attacks. His lack of experience speaks for itself. However, the real issue spawns into pragmatism. Obama will tax the economy to its demise, embrace defeat in the Middle East, abandon Israel, bomb our allies (much like Clinton did!), ‘hold hands and sing songs with Iran as they develop weapons and fund terrorists’ (as my good friend likes to say), and socialize not only health care, but the entire economic and private sectors.
Despite all of the obscurities about the Obamarama, my main inquiry is this: Why has not one person been permitted to raise the Muslim question given the gravity of the charge? Whenever conservatives have pointed out this worthy speculation of Muslim affiliation, they have been deemed agents of intolerance, bigots, religious zealots, among many other token epithets of the left. Mitt Romney, former GOP presidential candidate, couldn’t enter a room without someone screaming ‘MORMON!’, and I don’t remember any Mormon ever bombing America. However, the instant patriotic Americans even anticipate scrutinizing the ‘religion of peace’, we are being too close-minded and/or plotting a crusade.
Hopefully, asinine Obama supporters will acknowledge the fact that Obama doesn’t take a political position on any issue, and abandon their support for his candidacy. Otherwise we really will be in for 4 years of “hope,” hoping for his disastrous term to be over.
